By the looming of week 4, I felt that we are
approaching our final project. Last week, we keep asking what are its features?
How does it look like? This week carries the answer with many files drawing its
frame. It was a stressful week for me as I tried to finish the tasks in 24
hours and I was the first to post in the discussion. Why? It is the
International NileTESOL conference in Egypt started on Mon. and finished on
Thurs. Although I was overloaded and exhausted, I tried to be accomplished. I
explored the three articles related to integrating technology in teaching
written language skills; reading and writing. They are rich and practical. The
recommended sites were also a heavy meal. I kept reading what exactly is
required. Only one site? I stated different objectives for a selected
mini-lesson from Breaking English news. I discovered many excellent sites for
not only integrating technology but also integrating the four skills. I intend
to use these sites in implementing my final project.
The second task was the technology-enhanced
lesson plan. It was demanding and I read the articles and tried to make some
changes to the sample provided to include all the fantastic features I have
learned from the articles. I found some aspects of similarities and differences
between technology-enhanced and traditional lesson planning. Both lessons have
learning objectives, but the technology-enhanced lesson specifies objectives
for technology use. Using authentic material in the technology –enhanced lesson
provides students with authentic information about the topic. In traditional
lesson, this can be done by reading some articles about the topic. Reports in
the traditional lesson will be written on papers which is time consuming and
sometimes inaccurate. Whereas, in technology-enhanced lesson the use of word
processor in writing and revising facilitates students' work and increases its
efficiency. Moreover, the audience in technology-enhanced lesson is not always
the teacher and the classmates as in the traditional lesson, but a live
audience, a factor that will motivate students and create a purpose for
writing. Unlike assessment in
traditional lesson plan, learning and language outcomes as well as technology
use are assessed in technology-enhanced lesson. Creating technology-enhanced
lesson plan was a rich experience for me.
Detecting the project problem, I think, is the
first brick in building the project. I stated a number of problems which will
complicate the process of choosing the X-large technique that will solve all
these problems. The good news is that we can utilize more than one e-tool to
solve the problem(s) by using technology. It is challenging to know that one of
the problems is using technology itself. By knowing what I am trying to solve,
who are the participants, and which learning context, I think the next step
will be finding the appropriate technology-based strategy.
Regards,
Amira